{"id":3762,"date":"2026-02-06T13:46:55","date_gmt":"2026-02-06T13:46:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/?p=3762"},"modified":"2026-02-11T11:22:34","modified_gmt":"2026-02-11T11:22:34","slug":"ia-justicia-contencioso-administrativo-espana-ue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/2026\/02\/06\/ia-justicia-contencioso-administrativo-espana-ue\/","title":{"rendered":"El posible uso de la inteligencia artificial en el \u00e1mbito judicial: contexto jur\u00eddico espa\u00f1ol y europeo. Especial referencia al contencioso-administrativo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Localizaci\u00f3n:<\/strong> Rivista italiana di Informatica e Diritto (RIID): Periodico Internazionale del CNR-IGSG<\/a>, ISSN-e 2704-7318, N\u00ba. 2, 2023<\/a>, 10 p\u00e1gs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Idioma:<\/strong> espa\u00f1ol<\/p>\n\n\n\n

T\u00edtulos paralelos:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The use of artificial intelligence in the judicial field: the Spanish and Europeanlegal context. Special reference to contentious-administrative Courts<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Texto completo  1 <\/a>   2 <\/a>   3 <\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dialnet M\u00e9tricas: <\/strong>3<\/strong> Citas<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Resumen<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Multiple<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

En esta investigaci\u00f3n hemos querido indagar en las posibilidades que tienen los sistemas de inteligencia artificial de ser utilizados en el \u00e1mbito judicial en Espa\u00f1a, aunque bien podr\u00edamos extrapolar nuestras conclusiones a cualquier otro Estado de Derecho europeo. Sabemos que en Estados Unidos y en el mundo anglosaj\u00f3n en general el uso de estos sistemas est\u00e1 pr\u00e1cticamente liberalizado, pero el proyecto de Reglamento sobre IA de la Uni\u00f3n Europea y el proyecto de Convenio Marco sobre IA del Consejo de Europa imponen l\u00edmites a la proporcionalidad y el respeto de los derechos fundamentales que son ciertamente necesarios para no socavar las garant\u00edas procesales. Los \u00f3rdenes jurisdiccionales m\u00e1s adecuados para el uso de la IA son el penal y el civil, ya que el contencioso-administrativo, con sus potestades discrecionales, sus conceptos jur\u00eddicos indeterminados y la existencia de intereses generales lo hacen inadecuado. Sin embargo, hemos propuesto algunos usos posibles en este proceso.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

English<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

In this research we want to investigate the possibilities that artificial intelligence systems have of being used in the judicial field in Spain, although we could well extrapolate our conclusions to any other European Rule of Law. We know that in the United States and in the English-speaking world in general the use of these systems is practically liberalized, but the draft Regulation on AI of the European Union and the draft Framework Convention on AI of the Council of Europe impose limits on proportionality and respect for fundamental rights which are certainly necessary in order not to undermine procedural guarantees. The most appropriate jurisdictional orders for the use of AI are criminal and civil, since contentious-administrative, with its discretionary powers, its indeterminate legal concepts and the existence of general interests make it inappropriate. However, we have proposed some possible uses in this process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

An\u00e1lisis sobre el uso de sistemas de IA en la justicia en Espa\u00f1a y en el marco europeo: l\u00edmites por proporcionalidad y derechos fundamentales, y encaje desigual seg\u00fan jurisdicci\u00f3n, con especial atenci\u00f3n al contencioso-administrativo y usos posibles.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3784,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[329],"tags":[246,327,335,333,137,334,18,11,336,191],"class_list":["post-3762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-publicaciones","tag-ai-act","tag-automatizacion","tag-consejo-de-europa","tag-contencioso-administrativo","tag-derechos-fundamentales","tag-garantias-procesales","tag-ia","tag-justicia","tag-proporcionalidad","tag-tribunales"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3762"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3762\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3769,"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3762\/revisions\/3769"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catedra.us.es\/iaderpub\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}